What is the difference between utilitarianism and deontology?
Thereof, how do utilitarianism and deontology differ?
Utilitarianism and deontology are two known ethical systems. Utilitarianism revolves around the concept of “the end justifies the means,” while deontology works on the concept “the end does not justify the means.” 3. Utilitarianism is considered a consequence-oriented philosophy.
Furthermore, what do utilitarianism and Kantian deontology have in common? The primary difference between Kant's deontology (the fancy name for his ethical theory) and utilitarianism, is that Kant viewed an action as right or wrong without respect to the consequences, whereas utilitarianism views an action as right or wrong only with reference to the consequences of the action.
In this manner, what is the main idea of deontology?
In moral philosophy, deontological ethics or deontology (from Greek δέον, deon, "obligation, duty") is the normative ethical theory that the morality of an action should be based on whether that action itself is right or wrong under a series of rules, rather than based on the consequences of the action.
What is an example of utilitarianism?
Classical Utilitarianism Being “bad” only increases the number of people in the world who are suffering. An example of utilitarianism that shows someone making an individual “good” choice that actually benefits the entire population can be seen in Bobby's decision to buy his sister, Sally, a car.