What was the Textus receptus translated from?

Asked By: Valeriy Daga | Last Updated: 31st May, 2020
Category: hobbies and interests genealogy and ancestry
4.8/5 (87 Views . 16 Votes)
In Christianity, the Textus Receptus (Latin: "received text") is an edition of the Greek texts of the New Testament established by Erasmus in the 16th century.

Click to see full answer


Similarly, what text is the KJV translated from?

King James Version
Complete Bible published 1611
Online as King James Version at Wikisource
Textual basis OT: Masoretic Text, some LXX and Vulgate influence. NT: Textus Receptus, similar to the Byzantine text-type; some readings derived from the Vulgate. Apocrypha: Greek Septuagint and Latin Vulgate.

Similarly, is NASB based on Textus receptus? But for your question about the NASB. It is a very literal translation based on the oldest texts. Now the KJV is not based on the Majority Text. The major source for it is the Textus Receptus.

Also question is, is the Textus receptus the same as the majority text?

The Majority Text differs from the Textus Receptus in almost 2,000 places. So the agreement is better than 99 percent. But the Majority Text differs from the modern critical text in only about 6,500 places. In other words the two texts agree almost 98 percent of the time.

Is the NKJV based on the Textus receptus?

The NKJV is the basis for the Orthodox Study Bible. The New Testament is largely the same, being based on the Textus Receptus (which the Eastern Orthodox consider most reliable). Although the Old Testament was translated from the Academy of St.

37 Related Question Answers Found

WHO removed the Apocrypha from the Bible?

The Jewish scribes did not believe the Apocryphal books of the Old Testament were inspired. The original 1611 KJV contained the Apocrypha, it was removed in later editions. There are parts of the Apocrypha which the Catholic Church has used to justify prayers for the dead ( 2 Maccabees 12:38-46).

Is King James Bible accurate?

There is NO Bible which is the most accurate. THE BOTTOM LINE in ways explained above, the King James Bible is a very accurate translation, but not the MOST accurate.

Who actually wrote the Bible?

The author was traditionally believed to be the same person as both John the Apostle/John the Evangelist, the traditional author of the Fourth Gospel – the tradition can be traced to Justin Martyr, writing in the early 2nd century. Most biblical scholars now believe that these were separate individuals.

Do Catholics use the King James Bible?

In truth it only refers to the Diocese of Rome, although it is sometimes incorrectly used to refer to the Latin Rite of the Catholic Church. The main difference between the Catholic Bible and the King James version is that modern King James' Bibles have removed the Deuterocanonical books from the Old Testament.

What Bible verses are missing in the NIV?


The sixteen omitted verses
  • (1) Matthew 17:21. KJV: Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting.
  • (2) Matthew 18:11. KJV: For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost.
  • (3) Matthew 23:14.
  • (4) Mark 7:16.
  • (5 & 6) Mark 9:44 & 9:46.
  • (7) Mark 11:26.
  • (8) Mark 15:28.
  • (9) Luke 17:36.

Did King James change the Bible?

King James did not rewrite the Bible. James I commissioned a new translation of the Bible which was completed in 1611. James himself was not involved, the translation was done by 47 church of England scholars. It was probably not even called the King James Bible for around a century after its completion.

What Bible translations are based on the Textus receptus?

The biblical Textus Receptus constituted the translation-base for the original German Luther Bible, the translation of the New Testament into English by William Tyndale, the King James Version, the Spanish Reina-Valera translation, the Czech Bible of Kralice, and most Reformation-era New Testament translations

What Bible was before King James?

The most popular translation of the bible prior to the King James Version was the Geneva Bible. King James was the only reason why the KJV was so popular for so many years instead of the Geneva Bible.

How accurate is ESV Bible?

For one thing, the ESV is the most popular version among conservative evangelicals. It is more accurate than the NIV but not as rigid as the NASB. So its a perfect fit for comparison. The ESV is the 4th translation in a series of revisions which go back to the first modern Bible translation: the Revised Version.

What are Byzantine texts?


289, 868, 956, 963, 988, 1044, 1063, 1101, 1104, 1303, 1748, 1869, 2267, 2450, 2497, 2581, 2619, 2656.

Why is the King James Bible only?

The King James Only movement asserts that the King James Version of the Bible is superior to all other English translations.

Where did the ESV translation come from?

The English Standard Version (ESV) is an English translation of the Bible published in 2001 by Crossway. It is a revision of the Revised Standard Version that employs an "essentially literal" translation philosophy.

Which Bible translations use the Masoretic text?

The Masoretic Text was used as the basis for translations of the Old Testament in Protestant Bibles such as the King James Version and American Standard Version and (after 1943) for some versions of Catholic Bibles, replacing the Vulgate translation, although the Vulgate had itself already been revised in light of the

How many Alexandrian texts are there?

History of research. Griesbach produced a list of nine manuscripts which represent the Alexandrian text: C, L, K, 1, 13, 33, 69, 106, and 118. Codex Vaticanus was not on this list.

What is the critical text?


The critical text is an eclectic text compiled by a committee that compares readings from a large number of manuscripts in order to determine which reading is most likely to be closest to the original.

Who wrote the Geneva Bible?

Geneva Bible. Geneva Bible, also called Breeches Bible, new translation of the Bible published in Geneva (New Testament, 1557; Old Testament, 1560) by a colony of Protestant scholars in exile from England who worked under the general direction of Miles Coverdale and John Knox and under the influence of John Calvin.