Why is selective cutting less damaging to the environment than clear cutting?
Just so, what is the benefit of harvesting trees by selective cutting rather than clear cutting?
Clear-cutting is usually quicker and cheaper than selective cutting. It may also be safer for the loggers. Clear-cutting can damage the environment and the soil where the trees were cut. The soil is exposed to wind and rain.
Also, why are rangelands so fragile Why do we continue to heavily use them despite their fragility? They are semi arid, which makes them more likely to be disturbed. We need the land to raise cattle.
One may also ask, why might selective logging be preferable to clear cutting?
Selective logging—the practice of removing one or two trees and leaving the rest intact—is often considered a sustainable alternative to clear-cutting, in which a large swath of forest is cut down, leaving little behind except wood debris and a denuded landscape.
Why do Vines increase the damage to a forest done by selective cutting?
The presence of vines interconnecting the canopies of tropical forest trees has been thought to increase the damage to neighboring trees when a tree is felled during selective logging, resulting in larger canopy gaps and possibly prejudicting future timber harvests.