What makes good acceptance criteria?
Thereof, what should be in an acceptance criteria?
Acceptance criteria (AC) are the conditions that a software product must meet to be accepted by a user, a customer, or other system. Well-written acceptance criteria help avoid unexpected results in the end of a development stage and ensure that all stakeholders and users are satisfied with what they get.
Additionally, who should write acceptance criteria? Generally, acceptance criteria are initiated by the product owner or stakeholder. They are written prior to any development of the feature. Their role is to provide guidelines for a business or user-centered perspective. However, writing the criteria is not solely the responsibility of the product owner.
Correspondingly, what makes good acceptance criteria in agile?
Acceptance Criteria must be expressed clearly, in simple language the customer would use, just like the User Story, without ambiguity as to what the expected outcome is: what is acceptable and what is not acceptable. They must be testable: easily translated into one or more manual/automated test cases.
Do features have acceptance criteria?
Features and Capabilities. A Feature is a service that fulfills a stakeholder need. Each feature includes a benefit hypothesis and acceptance criteria, and is sized or split as necessary to be delivered by a single Agile Release Train (ART) in a Program Increment (PI).