What is the substantial evidence rule?
Consequently, what is the substantial evidence standard?
This standard falls between probable cause and preponderance of the evidence, and requires more than a “mere scintilla of evidence.” Substantial evidence is “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” (Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389 (1971).)
Similarly, what is required by the substantial evidence test? The conclusions reached must be supported by such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.
Furthermore, what is the substantial evidence test?
Substantial evidence is a legal concept that an individual piece of evidence is so sufficient that a reasonable person of sound mind could convict or acquit based on that one piece of evidence alone. For the courts to consider a piece of evidence as substantial, the evidence must pass the “substantial evidence test.”
What are the 3 standards of review?
Concerning constitutional questions, three basic standards of review exist: rational basis, intermediate scrutiny, and strict scrutiny. This form of standard of review is sometimes also called the standard or level of scrutiny.