What is the benefit of harvesting trees by selective cutting rather than clear cutting?
Category:
business and finance
environmental services industry
Clear-cutting is usually quicker and cheaper than selective cutting. It may also be safer for the loggers. Clear-cutting can damage the environment and the soil where the trees were cut. The soil is exposed to wind and rain.
Hereof, what is the difference between clear cutting and selective cutting?
Clear-cutting is the process of cutting down all trees in an area of forest at once. With selective cutting, only some of the trees in an area of forest are cut down at any one time. The next time, a different age group or species of tree in the forest is harvested.
- It supports more varieties of wildlife.
- It is more resistant to disease and insect manifestations.
- It leaves a lighter ecological footprint.
- It creates a more natural-looking forest stand after harvesting.
Also Know, what are the pros and cons of clear cutting and selective cutting when harvesting lumber?
- Pro: Financial Reasons. Clearcutting advocates argue that the method is the most efficient for both harvesting and replanting trees.
- Con: Effects on Plant and Wildlife.
- Pro: Increased Water Flow.
- Con: Loss of Recreation Land.
- Pro: Increased Farmland.
Selective logging is often considered a better alternative to clear cutting in which a large area of a forest is cut down, leaving little behind except wood debris and a deforested landscape. The ecological, social, and economic impacts drive a better understanding of efficient forest management techniques.