What does stare decisis mean in law?

Asked By: Elfreda Jhons | Last Updated: 23rd March, 2020
Category: news and politics law
4.3/5 (103 Views . 43 Votes)
Stare decisis is a legal doctrine that obligates courts to follow historical cases when making a ruling on a similar case. Simply put, it binds courts to follow legal precedents set by previous decisions. Stare decisis is a Latin term meaning "to stand by that which is decided."

Click to see full answer


Thereof, what is an example of stare decisis?

Stare decisis is the doctrine that obligates courts to look to precedent when making their decisions. These two principles allow American law to build case-by-case, and make our legal system a common law system. For example, let's say that Blue borrows Red's lawnmower while Red is on vacation.

Subsequently, question is, what is a precedent in law example? The definition of precedent is a decision that is the basis or reason for future decisions. An example of precedent is the legal decision in Brown v. Board of Education guiding future laws about desegregation.

Likewise, where does stare decisis come from?

Stare decisis is Latin for “to stand by things decided.” In short, it is the doctrine of precedent. Courts cite to stare decisis when an issue has been previously brought to the court and a ruling already issued.

What does stare decisis mean and why has this doctrine been so fundamental?

Stare Decisis. It is a Latin phrase meaning “to stand on decided cases.” This doctrine has been so fundamental to the development of our legal tradition because the legal system is formed on precedence. Therefore, decisions should also be formed the same way.

36 Related Question Answers Found

What are the two types of precedent?

There are two types of precedent: binding precedents and persuasive precedents. As the names suggest, a binding precedent obliges a court to follow its decision, while a persuasive precedent can influence or inform a decision but not compel or restrict it.

Why is stare decisis important?

Stare decisis is a legal doctrine that obligates courts to follow historical cases when making a ruling on a similar case. Stare decisis ensures that cases with similar scenarios and facts are approached in the same way. Simply put, it binds courts to follow legal precedents set by previous decisions.

Which countries use stare decisis?

Stare Decisis
  • 6.1 Austria.
  • 6.2 England.
  • 6.3 France.
  • 6.4 Germany.
  • 6.5 Spain.
  • 6.6 United States.

Why is case law so important?

A case law is important particularly since they establish legal principles which were unclear in the original legislation. A case law often contains the Legal rationale behind a decision, which makes it easier for Judges of lower Courts to interpret statutes consistently.

When did stare decisis begin?


Official reports of cases heard in various courts began to appear in the United States in the early 1800s, but semiofficial reports were not produced in England until 1865. When published reports became available, lawyers and judges finally had direct access to cases and could more accurately interpret prior decisions.

Can stare decisis be overturned?

Stare decisis – a doctrine, dating back to English Common Law, that courts should follow the precedent set by past cases – is not a “universal, inexorable command,” he wrote. Two long-standing precedents have been overturned in 5-4 decisions split along ideological lines.

What is an example of case law?

Case law is the reduction of the judge's decision to writing and published in specific books that publish the decisions of various courts. Some cases, for example, would include Miranda, Gideon, Roe v. Wade, Marbury v. Madison, Brown v.

What is the role of precedent?

The Importance of Precedent. In a common law system, judges are obliged to make their rulings as consistent as reasonably possible with previous judicial decisions on the same subject. Each case decided by a common law court becomes a precedent, or guideline, for subsequent decisions involving similar disputes.

Do judges have to follow stare decisis?

The idea that a judge is bound by (or at least should respect) decisions of earlier judges of similar or coordinate level is called horizontal stare decisis. Each panel of judges on the court of appeals for a circuit is bound to obey the prior appellate decisions of the same circuit.

Can a lower court overrule a higher court?


Although the lower court cannot overrule the higher courts judgement, but it may choose to depart from the precedent while hearing similar cases. Although the lower court cannot overrule the higher courts judgement, but it may choose to depart from the precedent while hearing similar cases.

What is the meaning of judicial precedent?

Judicial precedent means the process whereby judges follow previously decided cases where the facts are of sufficient similarity. The doctrine of judicial precedent involves an application of the principle of stare decisis ie, to stand by the decided.

Is the Supreme Court bound by precedent?

U.S.: Are supreme court justices bound by supreme court precedent? The apparent answer is no. They can rule any way they like. Circuit court judges, for example, are required to apply supreme court precedents even where they vehemently disagree with them.

How does stare decisis limit judicial power?

Devotion to stare decisis is considered a mark of judicial restraint, limiting a judge's ability to determine the outcome of a case in a way that he or she might choose if it were a matter of first impression.

What are the principles of common law?

Common law is a type of legal system in which judicial decisions are made primarily based on precedent. Precedent refers to prior court case decisions that will set a standard for how similar subsequent cases should be judged. Basically, cases with similar circumstances to prior cases will be ruled in the same way.

What if stare decisis was an inexorable command?


The Court observed that while the rule of stare decisis is not an “inexorable command,” a decision to overrule an earlier case “should rest on some special reason over and above the belief that [the] prior case was wrongly decided.”

How can judges avoid following a binding precedent?

The other two ways this can be done is through distinguishing a binding precedent – find differences in the cases so that the binding precedent does not apply to the current case – or disapproving – where judges can disapprove of past decisions made by a judge of the same level.

What do you mean by res judicata?

Res judicata (RJ) or res iudicata, also known as claim preclusion, is the Latin term for "a matter [already] judged" and refers to either of two concepts: in both civil law and common law legal systems, a case in which there has been a final judgment and is no longer subject to appeal; and the legal doctrine meant to